Smoke Grenades On Sale

Attivissimo and UFOs

When you live so 'in close contact with reality', and 'very easy to lose sight of the neutral point of view. This goes for everyone, unfortunately. Applies to the conspiracy, which fall beyond repair in a spiral of madness where only their ideas are right and where everything is seen by their distorting lens. You lose touch with reality '. This is true but 'also for those working on the other hand, for those seeking the truth 'in the midst of the lies. Unfortunately few of them succeed, 'cause these, too, sooner or later end up becoming slaves of their convictions, therefore the case that are no longer' examined the data and are derived from these concepts (and how 'right to be). No, the opposite happens. From the ideas, some concepts are derived data. This is called ideology.
Attivissimo Paul has often made an excellent job in some fields of study. For heaven's sake ', and' also true that I consider much of the research done wasted energy, because I firmly believe that we should not feel too well with the head about Sept. 11 conspiracies or humans that it 's never gone to the moon.

That said, Paul Attivissimo recently examined the case of Buzz Aldrin said that on Phobos (Mars asteroid) there is' a monolith "weird." According Attivissimo, ufologists (who are regarded as scum indistinct, all strictly conspiracy) cheered 'cause I thought it was a confirmation that the monolith was of extra-terrestrial origins.

analyze the situation with the right rigor:

1) Buzz Aldrin never spoke of a man-made object on Phobos.

-> This point is 'clear, and it' also made it clear from the speech of Paul Attivissimo. Except that, according to the ideas of active, for UFO (indistinct), Buzz Aldrin had confirmed the existence of a monolith of artificial origin. So I wonder, by what mental operation Attivissimo Paul has created this mass "indistinct" of ufologists who said, unanimously, 'Aldrin said that the existence of an artificial monolith?

Chira this ideal type of Ufology and 'Attivissimo was generated by using a highly ideological thought process, which puts the ufologist like a conspiracy.

In any case, very busy at this time is right to say that Buzz Aldrin has never talked about man-made structure.

2) The problems are on point 2, where Attivissimo played a bit 'too much on words, always be overshadowed by his ideology. Is very active and 'even bother to quote the definition from a dictionary of Monolithic. Typical ploy of those who have never done in his life and academic research that has as its highest point of 'truth' "the dictionary (lol), but that 's another story.
Attivissimo argued openly referred to as the Monolith Aldrin spoke to was absolutely natural sources (which are in the same video, Buzz says, "and 'was to put the Universe, or God if you want). According Attivissimo therefore Buzz spoke simply because 'this monolith would stimulate the public once again into space, given that in recent times very few are interested in space. E ' what I also said Aldrin. We

but 'we are intelligent people and not hide behind a finger, this is the finger of Attivissimo or Aldrin. What I want to reflect on which are the words of Aldrin, not the nature of the monolith. Whether natural or artificial at this juncture I do not care.

But do you think the public would really be pushed to a new interest in space only for a natural stone from the normal form curious?!?! I mean, 'with all the interesting things that we are in space (think of Mars), NASA should venture into a multibillion-dollar project to go to a picture of a stone "natural" to stimulate public opinion?

To me, as a common citizen, to go to a picture of a normal stone, I could care less. And you? Moreover, as a scientist, I would find a lot more 'interesting to study (example) better than the atmosphere of Mars, which one (A is A) only Rock. Are you kidding? What is' a joke?

So how to solve this issue? The question has one answer. Repeating once again that we do not know the source of that monolith and we're just looking statements Aldrin ... It 'obvious even to a 5 year old child who was playing Buzz deliberately with the allusion to a structure of extra-terrestrial nature. 'Cause this is, of course, could go to stimulate the public to space research.

So inviteteri davverso Mr. Attivissimo to do more 'attention with his post next time.
In the coming days we will also open another question from Attivissimo, Edgar Mitchell's claims. Where even in this case there are obvious structural errors. Suffice it to say that the issue is so open ':

"Edgar Mitchell says UFOs exist" BUFFALO

Well, here it is apparent the fabulous Attivissimo scientific method, that is the envy of the most' noble conspiracy sites. Why

'Edgar Mitchell has really said that UFOs exist, so it is not' a hoax. You can 'then discuss whether the content of the statement is true or false (if UFOs exist or not), but that Edgar Mitchell has claimed that UFOs exist is' a fact, true.

Attivissimo Not likely.

PS Forgive the lack of accents, but I write from a U.S. keyboard.

Cold Showers Erections

The case of Joan and the program "Mystery" A methodological problem

There are some things that leave you speechless. Among these, certainly falls in the case of Joan, the woman abducted by aliens and "seeded" over and over again to create a hybrid alien-umano.La story of Joan came out during the last two programs of "Mystery", a new program Mediaset led by Enrico Ruggeri dedicated to the world and the mystery of the inscrutable.
As happens now for decades, the issue still can not UFO (Except in rare cases) to enjoy autonomy, and can thus be made only within a context of many other mysteries. Pyramids, Atlantis, UFOs, Vampires: all the same thing.
Giovanna, its history, the program of Mediaset, the same Henry Ruggerri have given a great example of trash TV. Moreover Ruggeri is not the first time you venture into land of ufology "exotic" and not very scientific, everyone will remember well the transmission with a studio guest Corrado Malanga. This time we rirprova Ruggeri.
There are many things that make you smile tornarno and that the story of the beloved Joan. Starting with the same description of Alien, which clearly recalls a well-established substrate of knowledge in conspiracy literature. The alien who does not feel feelings. The alien can no longer reproduce. The alien who comes to earth to create the human-alien hybrid.
here I do not want to do a trial of Joan. We are in a free country and everyone has a right to express them (also odd) views. The problem is not John, the problem is how the whole thing has been analyzed and presented to viewers. The problem then is once again an incorrect methodology that magically reveals a well-concocted false.
Let's see a little 'what happened during the broadcast: We have presented a series of photographic evidence, a series of "signs" on the body of Joan and The notorious end of a movie alien fetus. And here comes the fun part. To analyze the movie studio was a ufologist (in brackets belonging to that line of thought that still gives heed to bales of Col. Philip Corso). I wonder what it cost to call a doctor, a professional, a veterinarian, or any other health experts to consider testing video? What then do a cost analysis for simplicity of the DNA of the alleged fetus? There has been talk of analysis "expensive", but with all the support behind Mediaset do not believe that the economic factor accounts so much. So why did all this happen? It 's very simple. Media
work increasingly through the story, because people like to listen stories. Everything is told as a story, a crime of a war. Everything becomes a story in installments to keep the viewer glued. The only way therefore to gain from the "history" of Joan for Mediaset was to serialize the event and create a story which takes the viewer glued, waiting for subsequent events.
The problem is simple: if I'm holding a baby REALLY hybrid-alien, that is, if the experts can tell me clearly that they are in front of a very exceptional fact there is no need to serialize the story to get share: the mere fact of having made a discovery like that capitalize on the interest of viewers worldwide in just one second. In a word, if history Joan had been genuine:
a) There would be no need to serialize
b) In the studio there were not doctors or experts and a ufologist.

The fact that the story was instead presented it is clear evidence that it is all a big lie. As this is the only possible way to gain from a lie.

Sample 60th Birthday Programs

This time, I avoid talking about a specific case. This time I will talk about the situation (dramatic) facing the UFO.
The thing I'm certain is that unless we hurry to reform, to recreate, to completely reshape the field of UFO study can all go home safely. You can not
that ufology is trapped in a gigantic network of nonsense.

The main point, to clarify, is that ufology is now caught between two extremes of thought that are slowly crushing. Both these currents have apparently abandoned the scientific method.

The first problem, is skeptical of the matrix. He comes from those who "believe" to the UFO phenomenon. We call this problem as well overlapping levels of analysis. To illustrate the problem well
overlapping levels of analysis, it is necessary to take a step back.
We speak of the UFO phenomenon, a somthing that " is a phenomenon that is not similar to any weather event / Known physical and non-reproducible by humans . "So we use this definition of UFO, this is of course a definition of a" broader "than the classic" unidentified flying object ", but it's functional for what we're about to say.

The Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis

The Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis is undoubtedly the most popular explanation for the UFO phenomenon. The main methodological problem is: where do we draw out an explanation? Let me explain. Just because these UFOs are in heaven we can talk about extra-terrestrial hypothesis? course is an argument a bit 'too weak.
The literature has proposed different solutions to this problem. This practice of bringing in other fields of research not strictly related to UFOs, abductions or contacts for example. Through the literature of abduction, or other phenomena (such as contacts or Crop Circles), just trying to connect the UFO phenomenon to some extra-terrestrial.
But everything has some immediate problems:

a) The UFO phenomenon is a phenomenon experienced . course. Sure. That is to say that the UFO phenomenon, there . There are phenomena "is not equivalent to any weather event known physical rirpoducibili and not by humans." The phenomenon of abduction, and other mystical realities can dream of such security. This does not mean that these phenomena do not exist, but simply means that while the UFO is a fact established, a fact, the abductions are not. Connect variaible therefore a certain "X" to a variable degree of "Y", it means discrediting the variable X itself.

b) Suppose, to pretend that the abduction phenomenon to enjoy the same scientific quality of the UFO phenomenon. UFO Connection -> Abduction is still weak. Because the search field "+ UFO Abduction" has even less scientific credibility of the abduction phenomenon itself. And with scientific credibility does not intend to give an opinion of value, because, I repeat, the abduction phenomenon could easily be real. I am simply saying that his study did not have that support scientific and instead had ufology (and is not intelligible as it is the UFO phenomenon). Even today, the study of abduction is carried out in ways that clearly violate the principle of falsifiability and the method scienifico in general.

In other words, it is dangerous to continue the argument with extra-terrestrial phenomena external to the UFO phenomenon itself. This does not mean that these phenomena are not related UFO activity, but these arguments, however, much more fragile and more easily attacked, with the result that later the whole field of UFO research suffers.
Quite the contrary, the UFO phenomenon per se, has an incredible strength. A sound that deserves to emerge.

Where can therefore come up with the extra-terrestrial hypothesis? Simple, the UFO phenomenon itself. Given the definition that we gave at the beginning, you may think a bit 'up.
The event, we said, is not assibilabile any known physical phenomenon. At the same time, can not be reproduced by current human technology. Combining these two terms, it soon becomes clear that if this phenomenon is not a natural event, whether this is not the work of man ... Well, who needs to be done? We mathematical certainty that there are other beings on our planet more intelligent than us, able to be able to explain the phenomenon. There was indeed an intelligent species antagonist, superior to us, then the answer would probably be found on this planet. If, however, on this planet there is no other technological species so advanced, then the most rational hypothesis that can be done ... And 'that the UFO phenomenon is extraterrestrial in origin.
All this may seem trivial, but this fact should give pause to many. Given the fact that the UFO phenomenon (as we have described for the opening) is real (and I mean those low percentages of sightings deemed "genuine"), the only possible rational hypothesis is precisely that extra-+ earthly. This has very strong implications: it means that the fact that UFOs are extra-terrestrial has a high percentage of possibilities. Consequently, the hypothesis that the earth there is extra-terrestrial is a possibility that theoretically approaches certainty.

Why, though, if the UFO phenomenon is determined to be a certainty, it is not a result also suggested extra-terrestrial? Because we talked about the definition of "physical phenomena known." So there is always the possibility that the UFO phenomenon is due to physical phenomena that we do not know.

At this point the central question: what should the UFO? Ufology should try to see if the UFO phenomenon is a phenomenon of extra-terrestrial or a physical phenomenon not yet known. This study goes way through two tracks: first, keeping an eye on the developments of research in atmospheric and physical phenomena in general. The second is to develop a series of evaluation parameters (to be methodologically perfect) to determine whether a given phenomenon is showing signs of intelligence. So, to begin to isolate a number of cases and study them to see if these signs of rationality exist or not. This is the only perfect way to be able to have the final confirmation of the hypothesis extra-terrestrial. For example, a UFO that flies away at the approach of an aircraft can be recognized as intelligent activity. These cases are brought to the attention of the public, no longer simply the UFO phenomenon (which, as we said, is now certainty).
the end of this research, within a reasonable time you can also operate in a few years, we can confirm definitively whether the UFO phenomenon is extraterrestrial in origin or simply a natural phenomenon not yet known.
The most observant will have noticed my omission: I have not spoken to Earth hypothesis (read: military) to the UFO phenomenon. This hypothesis must clearly be rejected, but I'll so more detail elsewhere.

The question of overlapping levels of analysis

This problem, called SLA to simplify, is the weak side of the mold letturatura skeptical of unscientific. This problem, thankfully, is simply about the popular press and academia. In summary is this: When it comes to UFO phenomena, do not answer discussing the UFO phenomenon in question, but you look at other levels of analysis that has nothing to do with ufology. Here, therefore, established as the focus CICAP their tests under the same heading ufology, Crop Circles. On the abduction. On the contacts. But not on the events UFO. These arguments, as I repeat it are interesting and can easily be connected to UFOs, are actually very weak. Even on TV, the UFO phenomenon is pervaded by the ALS problem. Guests programs are often former abductees, who says people have the alien in the brain, are shown video of crop circles and so on. In particular, I was sorry to see Paul Attivissimo, person I have always respected and followed by years (almost from its first guide to the Linux operating system), fall into this trap. His works are undoubtedly valuable sull'undici September: there is that Paul Attivissimo respond point by point, the main issue. As for the question ufology, but Paul seems to be heavily unprepared and unscientific. This is however a different matter, maybe I will deal later. Probably the poor Paul had to work all day on the rubbish (why are these chemtrails and assumptions on the inside job of 911) began to be a wee bit skeptical of ideological vision of a not too scientific.
were saying, this problem is the SLA. One can only hope that the skeptics in the future, may abandon this approach. Why do we need to skeptics. Even better would be to follow the letter of ufologists the principle neutral, so that you can avoid battles stage among believers and nonbelievers. But so maybe it's still early. SLA
The problem, however, also focuses on the UFO. In fact, if ufologists in their journals will continue to mix Crop Circles, abductions and friends will be singing themselves to show the side of non-believers. Ufologists do not realize they hold all the answers, they hold a very solid argument that does not need any external support. Awake!
And of course, forget all the stories of cover-up. Again, not because this is not true (as can be can not be), but why not certified and thus easily attacked. The UFO phenomenon is demonstrable and not attack, use it. I am

for autonomy of the field of UFO study, those who love me follow me.

This can be demonstrated, is not affected

34 Weeks Pregnant Sharp Pains Above Belly Button

The "secret documents" of the CUN

This is a story of everything Italian. The President of the National UFO Center, Roberto Pinotti, recently spoke of "hot" official documeti posesso CUN, these documents prove beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of extraterrestrial activity on Earth. A sort of Holy Grail of Ufology Italian. From what can be inferred from the text of Pinotti, rather than alien activity on earth, the documents are talking about technology "exotic" now in an advanced state of development with the Government of the United States of America, this technologies would be the result of work on reverse engineering alien artifacts. These marvelous machines, tools that see free energy, teleportation, engines capable of exceeding the speed of light etc. are deliberately kept hidden from the U.S. government. According to the thesis Pinotti, the present "World Order" has absolutely no need for these technologies: our economy is based on oil, the atom and the drug trade. Citing always Pinotti, an antimatter cannon is "useless" to fight a war today. The same
Pinotti, said that will not reveal the existence of these documents. This fact would lead to serious risks for him and his family, as well that perhaps the world could not be "ready" for such disclosure.
Roberto Pinotti considered a guru by most contemporary ufology, Italian and otherwise. His theory of the "Great Game", which seeks to explain why the aliens are not involved in earthly life, was also cited recent work by the only academic studies of policy on UFOs, from the study of International Relations Alexander Wendt.
Ufology Italian, is a field of research is very ill. There are different schools of thought now, and now many ufologists their focus and "exotic", embracing the abduction, contact and other sectors (quoting Paolo Bolognesi). This success is probably for one simple reason: the attempts of all failed to respond to the UFO phenomenon with scientific methods. In 40 years of study, this has led to nothing. For this reason, a number of people have taken quieted streets, seeking the answers to the UFO problem with a spiritual approach, mystical and totally unscientific. The CUN in its most narrow, at least formally, was anchored to the classical view. Yet even their approach can not be defined as free of defects: on several occasions the National UFO Center has experienced a sort of elitism, "they are the ones who know." Not uncommon for members of the CUN boasted of their work on commission the Italian Government, their privileged relations with the secret services, military and so on. If this is true or not, I do not know. What I know is that this created an unprecedented spiral of degeneration. A number of other particles, have come to the CUN accuse of "collaborating" with the cover-up, while the CUN himself began to take an approach of "keeper of the truth" not too different from other groups that give the same name, only following the path of mysticism and religion. "We know and you believe it," this is faith, not science.
Returning to the famous secret documents. I do not know if these documents are true or false, I do not know if these documents exist or not exist. I know for sure that the text of Pinotti is filled with a variety of elements letturatura UFO-style conspiracy, as well as other factors taken "weightless" from other schools are not strictly UFO. I am referring for example to the issue of the New World Order. A theme is now always present in all versions of conspiracy theories: September 11, from chemtrails and recently echoed ufology. So I ask myself the mental construct of Roberto Pinotti, is so different from that of Corrado Malanga? Even the latter figure is more or less all their conspiracy theories on the ground, sheckera well and adds the component UFO.
But we go beyond. Beyond the debate about the veracity of the statements made, it remains to understand the meaning of this statement.
A statement of this kind can only mark a huge stain on the career of Roberto Pinotti. Pinotti has not pulled out a scientific fact to be discussed, he simply said "I've got but I can not let you see." In practice, requires a leap of faith to readers. This is simply crazy.
So: given that these documents will never be revealed, these documents can never be studied and examined. Thus, these documents outside the CUN does not exist. Thus, these documents are not a "given" to discuss. With faith you do not get anywhere. What he should do so
Roberto Pinotti? We simply do not reveal anything to the public. Are you afraid for burning things you read? Well, simply say nothing. Because with this attitude Roberto Pinotti has not contributed in any way, to the UFO research (have nothing), has only the heavily stained CUN. Putting serious doubts on his scientific method.

Windows 7 Driver Creative Extigy

What's Next

UFO Watcher is mainly oriented to the political study of the UFO phenomenon, with special emphasis on the control of the allegations in the UFO field, especially on agriculture policies and military environments. To study the UFO phenomenon with the proper tools of science policy can bring interesting results, as will be seen with articles to be published in coming days. In particular we will try to answer these questions:

-It 's possible to imagine a cover-up, a government conspiracy?

"If UFOs are really extra-terrestrial beings, why do not you reveal to the world?

"If UFOs are really extra-terrestrial beings, what can you expect from a" contact "? What are the consequences for the social, religious, political and international relations?

Lic Jeevan Tarang Policy

Reagan and Bill Clinton

Here now another famous presidential statement on the subject of UFOs.
this time to talk about is the U.S. President Ronald Reagan in a speech to the UN.
summary Reagan admits that sometimes stops to think, that if there were an alien threat the differences between the U.S. and the Soviet Union would collapse in an instant, and the world would be united in front of the common enemy. Agggiunge Finally, if the alien menace and were already present among us?
Usually in this case the video on youtube stop to show another "confirmation" Journal of the existence of extraterrestrial activity on the planet. Once again, however, those who put these videos on the net continues to report incomplete statements to support his thesis. For alien threat "have amongst us" In fact, Reagan intended the threat of war, the possibility of destroying the world with a war nuclear power. He, in fact, compares the alien threat of war between the U.S. and USSR. As you can see from this video:



Now, at first glance one might ask: what the hell I guess the comparison with an alien threat of war and the atomic bombs? This speech can be understood only after realizing the first part of the declaration. In the first part actually
Reagan clearly mentions his idea for this his hypothetical scenario: an alien threat and the world together to fight it.
For those who study international relations, the academic discipline that studies the relationships between states, the declaration of Reagan, however, is anything but focus on aliens.
the historical level, in fact, we will remember how the world is the United States during World War II to destroy the Nazi enemy. It is a thing well known: in the presence of a common enemy political differences disappear. This led to the great alliance between the U.S., USSR and Europe. Dropped this common enemy, the divisions have emerged. Reagan wants to understand why in the first part of this speech in the presence of a common enemy, the United States and the Soviet Union, would return to work.

Why this common enemy is identified as an alien?

The answer must be connected to the concept of superpower. In political discourse, academic and the historical fact of the Cold War began to talk of "superpower", not more than just "power."
at the core of the concept of a superpower, which distinguishes it clearly from that of "power", that is NOT a superpower is more antagonistic, if not the other superpower. Simply stated, even if all the states of the world, except the other superpower, it allessero against it, this would not be enough.
What does this mean? It means that a common enemy, is not identifiable within a bipolar system of international relations based on two superpowers. This suggests that the only possible common enemy can come from space. We therefore suggest
the above in mind: a common enemy, a common threat, can lead to two states cooperate, at worst not to get between them. And the goal of Reagan is this: do not reach the United States and the Soviet Union in war.
Why, then, speaks of "alien threat" which is already formulating the possible war?
The term alien threat thus takes the meaning of a common enemy that can unite the two contenders. The common enemy is identified by Reagan ... In the same threat of a war! In fact, a devastating nuclear war is the Soviet Union that the United States. The real threat is common to that time, was therefore the possibility of nuclear war. Looking history, this hypothetical war was clearly set up as a threat. In fact, the United States and Soviet Union never made it to war with one another just because both are aware that such a war would sweep away the respective states (and beyond). That 's what is called by scholars as the "Balance of Terror". And indeed it worked ...

My Bf Always Kisses My Boobs

alien menace wants to know the truth about UFOs? The mission

For the network runs a statement of former U.S. presiente Bill Clinton about his interest in the UFO question.

The video in question is as follows:



"If the Air Force United States of alien bodies recovered, I did not reported. And I want to know "


This is a very strong statement and interesting. But since the President of the smiles in the video makes you immediately aware that something is wrong. The full statement is this:



One can thus find the full declaration. In the beginning

Clinton says "I received a letter from a 13 year old boy, Brian, from Belfast. Now, if you're in the audience this is the answer: No, as far as I know, an alien spacecraft did not crash in Roswell in 1947 "The whole declaration

short, is a simple joke. This course is not to say that there has never been an interest of Bill Clinton to the UFO issue, but there seems genuinely the case of this statement in 1995.

How To Clear The Phlem From A Babies Throat

First of all a warm welcome to all of this, my virtual little experiment. Reading the title is fairly easy to identify what will be the subject of these pages. UFO, a big word. we really need another blog on the web were the UFO subject? The answer is yes. The reasons for this are manifold. Number one, completely lacking in a "control over statements in the UFO field, daily We are constantly bombarded by news, alleged sightings, official statements, etc.. It 's easy to see that this information, however, are almost never checked. The approach sicentifico UFO field has never been able to establish fully.
Some may argue, why not use conventional means, such as the National UFO Center or CICAP? Both systems
unfortunately fail to use a scientific approach to research. For love, I am still means good, but far from being considered reliable. The CUN continues to struggle between the attempt to apply a rigorous scientific method and the will to make room - for obvious reasons of visibility-a junk news. CICAP however has never operated a regular control in the field of UFO claims over the years has limited his activities on well-known crop circles. A subject that is not dealt with in these pages.

The second reason is the attempt to structure a model of precise analysis, functional and useful to the study of UFO phenomena.